Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 07:24

Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Grandfather's simple changes reversed pre-diabetes diagnosis that left him 'petrified' - AOL.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
New Videos Show How Fantasy Life i Has Been Beefed Up On Switch 2 - Nintendo Life
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How is bestiality wrong, but killing animals for sport or trophies is considered okay?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Staying in This Place Too Long Could Change How You Age, Scientists Say - The Daily Galaxy
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Reality TV star’s son dead at 16: ‘Life is so cruel and unfair’ - AL.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why is there a lack of affordable housing in the USA despite a surplus of empty homes?